Irresponsible Media Reporting on the Officer Chauvin Trial
Anyone who has seen the evidence presented in Officer Chauvin’s trial would agree the events surrounding George Floyd’s tragic death were not as simple as the cell phone footage made them out to be.
In cross examinations the eyewitnesses have testified to a number of factors which should create a reasonable doubt of guilt. Genevieve Hansen, an off-duty Minneapolis firefighter who was at the scene, expressed extreme disbelief over the unusually long EMS response time. Members of the ambulance crew testified the scene looked “unwelcoming,” and they were forced to leave before proper medical care could be rendered.
These two testimonies do not boldly proclaim Officer Chauvin’s innocence, however, they cast light on the tragic situation and provide reasons to doubt that Officer Chauvin intentionally, or even negligently, killed George Floyd.
Mass media journalists and the blue checks on Twitter would disagree. They declared Officer Chauvin guilty before they knew who Officer Chauvin was. Ultimately, the jury will decide guilt or innocence based upon the available evidence. The more important issue at hand is the news media’s willingness to be a cheerleader in support of the state.